What comes after post-modernism? I asked a couple of posts ago - and did so partly to encourage people to buy my book which (I modestly suggests) contains the answer.
I've had a number of completely contradictory responses - congratulatory messages on Facebook, a cascade of articles about the impossibility of objective truth, and defending the prevailing post-modern culture. For Liberals, these are difficult issues - because I am suggesting there is a lazy, corrosive kind of liberalism, and we need to move beyond it to find a high, more demanding Liberalism, a Liberalism with depth, which has some chance of surviving another century.
The ages at a glance
Modernist | Post-modernist | New Humanist | |
Emerging nation | Germany | France | UK |
Presiding ethic | Truth | Tolerance | Wholeness |
Besetting sin | Tidiness | Relativism | Obscurity |
Inspiring technology | Assembly line | Internet | Solar cell |
Primary language | Architecture | Literature | Narrative |
Presiding genius | Walter Gropius | Jacques Derrida | David Bohm |
Cheerleader | Roger Fry | Charles Jencks | Position vacant |
Since publishing the book, I have wondered whether the besetting sin of the new humanism is really obscurity, after all. I'm not sure it isn't actually going to be pomposity - this is after all the sin of people who believe they are in communication with objective truth. So I am going to be very careful from now on not to be either obscure or pompous if I can possibly help it.
But do feel free to join in the real debate about the future: read The Age to Come: Authenticity, Post-modernism and how to survive what comes next (Endeavour Press). And let me know what you think!