Why is it that the establishment doesn't seem to be able to tell the difference between criticising the behaviour o the big banks and being anti-business? David Cameron's speech yesterday certainly didn't.
In fact, being pro-business and pro-enterprise ought to mean major criticisms of the dysfunctional banks, who are really failing to support productive business, and real action on monopoly power - because that is what UK business needs:
http://www.neweconomics.org/blog/2012/02/24/to-british-business-drunk-or-sober